Industry knowledge. Custom AI.

Custom AI for better banking decisions.

Grow relevant customer relationships, support your people and improve the decisions behind daily operations. HolisticRM brings banking experience and custom model development together, tailoring the data, model combination and controls to your business case. Start with one decision you can measure, then expand on evidence.

  • More relevant customer engagement
  • Capacity focused on higher-value work
  • Measurable outcomes with clear ownership

Relevant experience for banking

Cofidis Hungary

Next-best-offer and outbound capacity

Cofidis Hungary

Our published case describes product-affinity models and contact allocation for Cofidis. A separate customer testimonial supports the collaboration. This is directly relevant to customer engagement and campaign operations.

Read the relevant reference →

Citibank

Earlier banking expert experience

Citibank

The portfolio describes next-best-offer and retention work from earlier expert experience. It informs our understanding of retail banking decisions, customer relationships and model delivery in complex banking environments.

Read the relevant reference →

Branch review reporting

MBH Bank

A published reference describes a Power BI report for monitoring branch Google review volumes and ratings. It demonstrates traceable measurement and management reporting for customer experience and reputation.

Read the relevant reference →

Top 10 AI use cases for banking

Ten practical opportunities for retail banks and consumer finance providers. We prioritise them with you by business value, data readiness, customer impact and delivery effort. These are proposed applications, with suggested measurement plans; the reference section identifies our documented experience.

01Next-best-offer and contact allocationHelp teams choose relevant offers and use limited contact capacity where it can add value.

What we implementCombine product affinity, eligibility and channel response models with approved contact rules; trial recommendations against a control group.

Business benefitBetter conversion per eligible contact and less unnecessary outreach.

How value is measuredIncremental bookings per eligible customer; net contribution after contact cost; complaints.

Risk: A response score may favour unsuitable offers or repeatedly target the same customers. Control: Apply suitability and eligibility checks before ranking, cap contact frequency and review customer outcomes by segment.

02Retention and early disengagementDetect changing customer behaviour early enough for a useful service intervention.

What we implementCombine transaction trends, service history and product usage; test service-led retention actions on comparable customer groups.

Business benefitPreserve valuable relationships while limiting unnecessary incentive spending.

How value is measuredIncremental retained active customers; retained contribution; incentive cost per retained customer.

Risk: Correlation with churn does not prove that contacting the customer will prevent it. Control: Separate propensity from intervention impact, use controlled pilots and suppress inappropriate or unwanted contact.

03Collections support and contact timingHelp collections staff prioritise supportive conversations and choose appropriate contact times.

What we implementModel response and repayment patterns using approved information; integrate recommendations into an adviser workflow with hardship flags.

Business benefitLess wasted contact effort and more consistent routes to assistance.

How value is measuredSustained arrangement rate; staff time per resolved case; repeat contacts and complaints.

Risk: Optimising short-term recovery alone can create harmful treatment of vulnerable customers. Control: Keep hardship handling and treatment policies authoritative, require human review and monitor customer outcomes alongside recovery.

04Fraud investigation prioritisationHelp investigators identify unusual activity and review connected evidence faster.

What we implementCombine transaction anomaly models and relationship features with existing rules; evaluate alerts in shadow mode before operational use.

Business benefitInvestigator attention focused on better-supported cases.

How value is measuredConfirmed cases per reviewed alert; false-positive rate; investigation time and customer friction.

Risk: Unusual behaviour can be legitimate, and emerging fraud can differ from training data. Control: Use reviewed case labels, monitor drift and route consequential actions through established investigation and escalation procedures.

05Credit-risk analysis supportGive authorised risk specialists clearer evidence for reviewing credit portfolios and model behaviour.

What we implementCompare interpretable baselines and suitable predictive models using time-separated data, calibration tests and documented feature lineage.

Business benefitMore consistent analysis and clearer visibility into portfolio changes.

How value is measuredCalibration error; stability across time and segments; analyst review time.

Risk: Biased data, proxy variables or leakage can produce misleading or unfair recommendations. Control: Agree permitted uses with risk and legal teams, independently validate performance and fairness, and retain accountable human decision processes.

06Document intake and completeness checksReduce repetitive reading and rekeying during application and servicing workflows.

What we implementExtract fields from approved document types, check them against deterministic rules and send uncertain or inconsistent items to reviewers.

Business benefitShorter processing queues and fewer avoidable requests for missing information.

How value is measuredCorrect fields per reviewed document; rework rate; processing time per completed application.

Risk: An extraction error can silently affect a customer record or downstream decision. Control: Use field-level confidence, source highlighting, validation rules and review gates before material changes are written to core systems.

07A knowledge assistant for banking teamsHelp employees find relevant procedures and product information during customer service.

What we implementRetrieve from permission-controlled, approved documents; show sources and effective dates; test answers on real service questions before a restricted pilot.

Business benefitFaster information retrieval and more consistent service explanations.

How value is measuredVerified answer accuracy; time to approved answer; escalation and correction rates.

Risk: Generated answers may be outdated, unsupported or reveal restricted information. Control: Enforce document permissions, require source-grounded responses, test adversarial prompts and escalate when evidence is insufficient.

08Branch demand and network decisionsForecast local demand and compare service-location options before committing resources.

What we implementCombine branch activity, customer journeys and suitable geographic context; evaluate forecasts across locations and time, then model alternative network scenarios.

Business benefitBetter capacity planning and more informed investment decisions.

How value is measuredForecast error by branch; waiting time; scenario cost and service coverage.

Risk: Historical patterns may miss structural changes or the needs of smaller customer groups. Control: Include local domain review, test stress scenarios and assess access to services alongside commercial performance.

09Customer journey and reputation intelligenceConnect acquisition, application progress and service feedback into a useful management view.

What we implementReconcile campaign, application and branch data; classify feedback with reviewed samples and expose traceable measures in a dashboard.

Business benefitEarlier identification of friction and a clearer basis for product and service improvements.

How value is measuredStage conversion; time to completion; verified issue resolution; feedback coverage.

Risk: Attribution gaps and selective feedback can misrepresent customer experience. Control: Show missing-data rates and metric definitions, validate classifications and separate observation from causal improvement claims.

10AEO/GEO for consumer banking discoveryHelp potential customers find accurate answers about your bank in search and AI-assisted journeys.

What we implementAudit representative questions, strengthen approved product and comparison content, and monitor brand mentions and cited sources across agreed AI services.

Business benefitClearer product understanding and more opportunities for qualified acquisition.

How value is measuredAccurate-answer rate in the defined sample; cited-page visibility; qualified applications from measurable journeys.

Risk: AI answers can change, omit conditions or repeat outdated rates and claims. Control: Use dated, reviewed source content, repeat comparable tests and correct underlying pages; avoid promises of guaranteed AI rankings.

These are opportunities to evaluate for your organisation. Priorities, feasibility and targets are agreed against your data, constraints and baseline.

Define the value before building the model

Tangible business benefits

More value from existing relationships

Use relevant offers and tested interventions to improve contribution after contact, incentive and servicing costs.

Measure: Compare net contribution per eligible customer with a control or agreed baseline.

Capacity released for complex work

Reduce repeat reading, manual data entry and low-value investigation while protecting service quality.

Measure: Measure hours per completed task, exception handling and rework together.

Better use of marketing and network spend

Link investment choices to qualified acquisition, demand and customer access rather than activity counts alone.

Measure: Track qualified acquisition cost, application completion and scenario performance.

Earlier detection of operational issues

Make changes in data quality, model behaviour and customer journeys visible to responsible teams.

Measure: Track time to detection, time to resolution and the volume of affected cases.

Benefits beyond immediate financial returns

Confidence in decisions

Source traceability, clear limitations and understandable recommendations help business and risk teams challenge the result.

A more consistent customer experience

Shared knowledge and explicit treatment rules can reduce avoidable variation between teams and channels.

Reusable organisational capability

Documented data, tests and operating procedures help your team own and develop the solution beyond its first use case.

How we implement banking AI projects

  1. Define the decision and its boundaries

    Bring product, operations, data and risk owners together. Specify who acts on the result, what must remain under human control and how business value will be measured.

    Output: Use-case brief, accountable owners, baseline and acceptance criteria.

  2. Establish a dependable data foundation

    Map permitted inputs, reconcile definitions and examine quality and representativeness. Enrich data only when the additional context is relevant and justified.

    Output: Data assessment, feature lineage and access controls.

  3. Develop data and models together

    Our holistic method builds on CRISP-DM and draws on PMI CPMAI principles. We improve inputs while comparing simple baselines, suitable model families and justified combinations against the same banking objective.

    Output: Versioned experiments and a proposed model set for your workflow.

  4. Validate value and customer impact

    Test on appropriately separated data and review errors with domain experts. Assess stability, fairness, explanation quality, security and operating cost; use independent challenge where the use case requires it.

    Output: Validation findings, limitations and a release decision.

  5. Pilot inside the real workflow

    Start in shadow mode or with limited users. Integrate approvals, monitoring and fallback procedures; compare outcomes with the baseline before expanding use.

    Output: Pilot evidence, operating instructions and a rollout decision.

  6. Operate, review and improve

    Assign model and process owners. Monitor drift, business outcomes and customer impact, maintain version history and require approval for material changes.

    Output: Monitoring set, incident and rollback procedures, and an improvement backlog.

Better data and better models, developed together.

Our Holistic Agile ML approach builds on CRISP-DM and draws on the business-led, iterative principles of PMI’s CPMAI methodology. Domain experts shape the decision, usable data and acceptance criteria. We improve relevant inputs while comparing suitable model families, architectures and model combinations against a practical baseline.

Protected test sets, versioned experiments and agreed go/no-go gates help catch leakage, weak assumptions and unnecessary complexity before wider rollout. A controlled pilot, human escalation, monitoring and rollback reduce operational exposure. The result is a bespoke model set selected for your business case and operating constraints.

Explore our AI Development Approach →

Make the risks visible. Build the controls in.

Risk controls are tailored to the decision, data and operating environment, with named owners and agreed acceptance evidence.

Customer impact and unfair treatment

An apparently accurate model can perform differently across groups or optimise an inappropriate objective.

How we reduce the risk: Define acceptable use and customer outcome measures before modelling; test relevant segments and provide effective human review and escalation.

Sensitive data and access

Customer information can leak through prompts, logs, retrieval systems or inappropriate permissions.

How we reduce the risk: Agree hosting and data boundaries, minimise inputs, enforce access controls and retention rules, and test both the model and surrounding workflow.

Model failure or confident errors

Data changes, leakage and unsupported generated answers can undermine decisions without an obvious system failure.

How we reduce the risk: Separate training and evaluation, preserve sources, monitor drift and uncertainty, and define when the system must abstain or revert to a trusted process.

A successful prototype that fails in operation

Integration effort, review workload and running cost can erase the apparent benefit of a pilot.

How we reduce the risk: Include process owners early and measure end-to-end cost and quality. Stage gates, limited rollout and an explicit stop decision constrain exposure before scale-up.

Questions about AI for banking

Do we need a large language model for every banking use case?

No. Forecasting, ranking and anomaly detection often call for other model families. We compare a practical baseline with models suited to your data and decision, using LLMs where language understanding or generation adds measurable value.

How does the holistic method reduce implementation risk?

We develop data and models together against one business objective, test assumptions early and make progression conditional on evidence. Clear ownership, appropriate validation and staged rollout reduce avoidable exposure; they do not eliminate risk or replace your governance decisions.

Can we begin without sharing customer data?

Yes. An initial discussion can use process descriptions, aggregate measures and synthetic examples. Any later data access is scoped with your owners, and other clients’ confidential information is not shared without their prior permission.

Which banking decision should AI improve first?

Bring one customer or operational challenge. We will explore the available data, the measure of success and a practical first pilot with clear controls.

Bring one business challenge, the decision you want to improve and an outline of your available data. Please leave out confidential customer or patient information.